Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Bob wrote:
This is not true. I posted a few days ago and said that it works and thanked you for the patch. I also asked some questions at the same time. I definately want to see this issue get fixed, so I tested it as soon as I could. Please change your tally to reflect this. Thanks, Laura | ||||
|
Front darts on Fitted Sheath in Build 6.12 without the patch are too high. They begin about 1" from apex on a 32D bust. | ||||
|
Hi Bob, If everybody is weighing on their status, then you can change me from confused to getting there. I made a sloper today and reported my results to Kaaren, and tomorrow I am going to make another one with some slight changes. HTH, Linda | ||||
|
You are right, Tessa. I am not talking about a pants waist vs a dress waist - only one, but it is tilted. For some reason which I don't understand, I am one of those whose side waist, on fitted patterns, is too low. I like exactly what you have described. The end of the reference line matches the indent on the side seam, so the pattern appears to be drafting accurately. The problem is the indent does not match the indent on my body. | ||||
|
Diane, Are you saying that you have noticed a change in 6.12 of the offset from the bust apex? I haven't seen this. My darts are too close to the apex, but I can easily change that with the dart tool. The program can't know what we prefer. There are guidelines for the offset, but much of it depends on the shape of the bust as much as the cup size. What some of us don't like about the patch is the location of the widest part of the dart. In raising the side seam indent, the widest part of the dart got raised too. | ||||
|
I can't say the distance from apex it is a "change" because I didn't look at it before 6.12. To say it another way, it is as you describe--the center of the dart is too high--in 6.12 without the patch, too. The only way to adjust the dart is to change length or width, not the center position of the dart. I would like it moved downward, just as you indicate. | ||||
|
Use the offset in the dart tool. | ||||
|
When I use that, the waist and side dart change equally. It would be helpful to have separate offset for waist and side dart. Additionally, it doesn't seem that front waist darts, as in the fitted sheath, should be offset from the bust at all (though it might be desirable in some instances). With two waist darts, one dart is aligning with the bust apex, the other is aligning with the tip of the side dart. This doesn't sew up well for an hourglass figure.This message has been edited. Last edited by: Diane Day, | ||||
|
My quickie tally was obviously not right. It was based on a review of the most recent posts and I did not look back at earlier ones. In any case, we got many responses today and we clearly need to give others a bit of time, so I'll repeat the tally tomorrow night and see where we are. The results look promising, though with mixed suggestions regarding the waist dart centers. We may need to make that separately adjustable from the side seam indent. Yuck. I hate to make things more complicated. Hopefully, we can find a way to predict from the measurements who will want their dart centers at which position. More data may make it clearer, so we'll collect a bit more. Thank you to all that have contributed. DressShopBob (Bob Clardy) | ||||
|
My report on the waist indent patch: it definitly is working for me. It raised the back waist curve by almost the full 3" above it's location without the patch. Also I now have some ease in the AB area that I didn't have before. I won't get time to do an actual garment until next week. Joan in Concord, CA Dress Shop Educator WinXP, Epson CX6400 Dress Shop Pro Suite and all add-ons and tools | ||||
|
I'm feeling a bit lost after several months of being away traveling and, in fact, I'm still trying to work out the new and fantastic digest format and the bells and whistles and karma stuff. I apologize if I've missed something/s -- my patterns (waist, circumferences, bust) fit perfectly when my measurements are correct. For example, it was only with the wearing (on our trip that I realized the my side waist to floor measurement needed to be shortened by 1/2", but it was definitely a measuring error and not a DS glitch/error. Now my pant pattern really IS perfect. I'm sure I'm understanding correctly that nothing will change unless we choose to use this patch or a new tool, but I for one do not have a need to do this. Admittedly, I've thought I had perfect measurements/patterns before, but persistence has paid off and now I finally do. | ||||
|
"Since most of the posts were ambiguous, I will make up categories as best I can: Did not work for me - 0 Confused - 3 (LindaF, InspiredSewing, LauraSews) Reject the whole idea - 5 (SewingGeek, DLJones, Teresa pople, grammiepam, Morgan Babb) Worked for me - 1 (ElizabethPope)" You've classified me as "reject the whole idea". How you reach that conclusion from my post which is copied below mystifies me. "Sorry Bob, I don't think that's correct (IMHO). A waist position is a waist position. We may choose to wear our trousers below our waist position but it doesn't alter where our waist point is. Surely the place we call our waist and from which we measure is the point at which we want any waist point or indentation point to occur whether it's pants, skirts, blouses or dresses." Teresa | ||||
|
Will make up the sheath tonight if I have time, but on paper it looks like it will help with my waist shaping. My problem wasn't as severe as some seem to think their problem was, but this looks on paper at least to improve the side shaping. More to come when I get the time to get the fabric version made up. | ||||
|
That sounds great! I do like the way the side shaping looks on paper, but agree the 'center pins' being raised could be a problem. Do you still want reports on the fit of our fabric versions? | ||||
|
Sorry I meant that to quote Kaarens post and something went bonkers. | ||||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |