Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Casual Panel Blouse
 Login/Join
 
posted
I made a casual panel blouse based on measurements that create a very well fitting fitted shirt. I can pinch out a large dart in the front armhole on the panel blouse and any other top without a dart. I did try to use the dart tool on this top but it created a broken draft.

I have submitted problems reports on both the dart tool and the armhole problem.

I am getting quite frustrated that any garment without a dart drafts this way. Has anyone else experienced this? If so, what have you done to fix it?

Thanks,
Renee Wuenstel
 
Posts: 97 | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
"I made a casual panel blouse based on measurements that create a very well fitting fitted shirt. I can pinch out a large dart in the front armhole on the panel blouse and any other top without a dart. I did try to use the dart tool on this top but it created a broken draft. "

The points in your post may provide the answer.

One is your expectation- I doubt you do but it sounds like you expect a casual undarted garment to fit the same way a darted fitted garment does.

A casual fit garment will always have more ease ( excess room over chart numbers) than a fitted blouse.

and A Darts purpose is to remove excess where it is not needed and release it where it is.

We can not fit and shape a flat piece of yardage over a curved surface without darts or pleats. You can drape it over a curved shape but it will fall in folds if the yard goods is soft enough.The larger the flat yardage the larger the pleat or "wrinkle".


I would check two measurements:
The front arm hole depth as your dart on a fitted garment may be masking an over large arm hole depth.(then rebalance the back arm hole.)

2 The high bust measurement,once again a large dart at side seam may be masking a too large high bust.either or a combination both of these may be contributing to what you are reporting.

Kaaren


patrns4u@aol.com
 
Posts: 3511 | Location: Henderson, Nevada | Registered: 02 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
Thank you for the info.

Can you give me some guidelines on how to evaluate the front armhole depth and the high bust? The fit I have on the fitted shirt appears to be very good. Do I just start playing with the numbers to see what happens to the fit?
 
Posts: 97 | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
"Can you give me some guidelines on how to evaluate the front armhole depth and the high bust? The fit I have on the fitted shirt appears to be very good. Do I just start playing with the numbers to see what happens to the fit?"

I have a formula I use for the frotn arm hole depth.varies for men versus women and kids.
adult women
Bicep ( taken right under the arm) + ease 3.30 divided by simple Pi 3.14= front arm hole depth. Round up to next 1/8th.

so a bicep of 14 would be
14+3.30=17.30/3.14= 5.50

back ahd would be one inch bigger at 6.5

High bust is another matter depends on cup size and bust depth
a B that "sits high" may be fuller than a DD that sits low....

High bust:

in general theres at least 1.5 to 2 inch difference between high bust and bust.the alrger the cup the bigger the difference.



Kaaren


patrns4u@aol.com
 
Posts: 3511 | Location: Henderson, Nevada | Registered: 02 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
If I make the changes suggested to the armhole depth, the cap height is only 4.92". It looks short. Does this seem reasonable on the sloper?
Front depth = 7.29, back = 8.29 (on drafted sleeve). I haven't made it up yet.

On the fitted shirt the cap height = 5.38".

Renee
 
Posts: 97 | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
Sorry those numbers for armhole depth are 6.29 front, 7.29 back.
 
Posts: 97 | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
quote:
If I make the changes suggested to the armhole depth, the cap height is only 4.92". It looks short. Does this seem reasonable on the sloper?
Front depth = 7.29, back = 8.29 (on drafted sleeve). I haven't made it up yet.

On the fitted shirt the cap height = 5.38".

Renee


Somethign else is out of balance if thats the case.the sloper cap height is generally only slightly smaller(within an inch) of the front arm hole depth when all is balanced.

I suggest sending me your chart for a quick look to see what appears to be in or out of balance.
Kaaren


patrns4u@aol.com
 
Posts: 3511 | Location: Henderson, Nevada | Registered: 02 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
quote:
Sorry those numbers for armhole depth are 6.29 front, 7.29 back.


Better....the cap height is still a little too low..send the chart.Ill look.
Kaaren


patrns4u@aol.com
 
Posts: 3511 | Location: Henderson, Nevada | Registered: 02 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
Sent. Did you receive?
 
Posts: 97 | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
Kaaren,

I made the changes suggested and sent another set of measurements along with the results. The sleeve cap height is even shorter now. Did you receive the email? I haven't heard from you since Friday so I am assuming you are just busy.

Thanks.
 
Posts: 97 | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
I am working and at the very end of a beta thats planned on beign released this week.and I do take some time off on weekends!

I took all of Sunday off after class ended at 2PM.

Ill check to see if the changed measurement set is being held in a to do file.
Kaaren


patrns4u@aol.com
 
Posts: 3511 | Location: Henderson, Nevada | Registered: 02 July 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata